Crematogaster crinosa

Longino, J. T., 2003, The Crematogaster (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Myrmicinae) of Costa Rica., Zootaxa 151, pp. 1-150: 126-128

publication ID

20256

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9813210B-5B9F-4FDE-86DD-3AE55166EC9C

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/64F13280-A029-E313-3EE1-30EAE8DA59FA

treatment provided by

Thomas

scientific name

Crematogaster crinosa
status

 

TAXONOMIC NOTES ON C. CRINOSA  HNS  AND RELATED FORMS

Throughout the tropical and subtropical Americas, highly insolated habitats are often dominated by Crematogaster  HNS  with the following characters:

· Colonies large and polydomous.

· Workers with pronounced size polymorphism.

· Head of large workers emarginate posteriorly.

· Scapes short, not attaining posterior margin of head when laid back (SI <75).

· Dorsal face of petiole short, nearly as broad as or broader than long, subquadrate or more often with strongly convex sides, usually widest at midlength.

· Postpetiole lacking ventral tooth; in dorsal view globular to subquadrate, as wide as or wider than long, and sometimes with faint longitudinal median impression.

· Face with short appressed pubescence and variable number of short erect setae, never with abundant long flexuous setae.

· Setae of mesosomal and gastral dorsum always short, flattened, and stiff, never long and flexuous.

I refer to these as the crinosa  HNS  complex, because Mayr's C. crinosa  HNS  is the oldest described taxon that exhibits these characters. Habitats where these ants are dominant include mangroves, seasonal dry forests, savanna, the upper canopy of wet forests, scrub and thorn forests, and anthropogenic habitats such as pasture edges, roadsides, and urban areas. The habitats where they are absent or show greatly reduced abundance are wet forest interiors and montane areas. In many ways this group is intermediate between other Neotropical Crematogaster  HNS  and the Crematogaster  HNS  s.s. that dominate the North American temperate zone. Wet forest Crematogaster  HNS  tend to have the petiole elongate, widest posteriorly, and tapering anteriorly. The crinosa  HNS  complex shows a shortening and broadening of the petiole, and a shift of the widest portion to midlength or even more anteriorly. Crematogaster  HNS  s.s. continues this trend, such that the dorsal face of the petiole has broad anterolateral lobes, is definitely widest anteriorly, and tapers posteriorly. Many rainforest Crematogaster  HNS  have the postpetiole globular. The postpetiole of the crinosa  HNS  complex may be globular or slightly bilobed. The postpetiole of Crematogaster  HNS  s.s. is strongly bilobed with a pronounced median sulcus. Many rainforest Crematogaster  HNS  have abundant long flexuous setae on the face and fourth abdominal tergite, heads that are more rounded posteriorly, and long scapes that extend to or beyond the vertex margin. The crinosa  HNS  complex and Crematogaster  HNS  s.s. are essentially identical in the short pubescence on the face, the generally sparse erect setae, and the short scapes. Given the prevalence of elongate petiole with posterior node among the most generalized myrmicines, the shortening and broadening of the petiole within Crematogaster  HNS  is probably apomorphic. Paralleling these morphological transitions is a habitat transition from moderate to increasingly harsh environmental conditions. The pattern may reflect a phylogenetic history in which the crinosa  HNS  complex was derived from a rainforest ancestor and moved out into open areas, dry areas, and the subtropics. Subsequently, under this scenario, Crematogaster  HNS  s.s. was derived from a crinosa  HNS  complex ancestor and moved across the frost line and into the temperate zone. The pattern could also be generated by parallel responses to natural selection, with the similarities between the crinosa  HNS  complex and Crematogaster  HNS  s.s. being due to similar adaptive responses to dry conditions. Also, the widespread occurrence of Crematogaster  HNS  s.s. in the Old World has not been incorporated into this scenario, and begs investigation.

Other Neotropical species that share the general habitus of the crinosa  HNS  complex but have long flexuous hairs are erecta  HNS  , moelleri  HNS  , stollii  HNS  , and crucis  HNS  . These are all more associated with rain forest and montane forest, compared to crinosa-group  HNS  species.

Taxonomy within the crinosa  HNS  complex is difficult. The following is a synopsis of character systems that vary within the crinosa  HNS  complex:

The face and clypeus may be largely smooth and shining, or with varying degrees of granular to finely longitudinally striate sculpture that extends from the anterior portion of the head. Often the clypeus, malar spaces, and space between eyes and antennal insertions is finely striate. These striae may extend up the sides of the head and medially, to the point where only a thin median strip remains smooth and shiny. In some cases the entire face is uniformly striate, causing a sericeous luster or mat surface.

The position and strength of the promesonotal suture varies. In some cases the promesonotum forms a uniformly curved convex profile, with the promesonotal suture not visible in profile or dorsally. In other instances the mesonotum is enlarged and the pronotal dorsum shortened, such that the remnants of the promesonotal suture can be seen as oblique impressions laterally, but the suture is effaced in dorsal view. In very large workers the suture may be entire but strongly arching anteriorly, such that the pronotal dorsum is very short (approaching the condition in the queen). Finally, the mesonotum may be less enlarged relative to the pronotum, and the promesonotal suture visible as an impression that more evenly divides the promesonotum. In lateral view this results in a promesonotal profile that is more flat-topped.

The dorsal face of the propodeum, which is always very short relative to the posterior face, may drop steeply to the propodeal suture, such that the juncture of the dorsal and posterior faces is strongly produced as an anteroposteriorly compressed ridge. In some cases the dorsal and posterior faces meet at an obtuse angle, such that in lateral view there is a distinct v-shaped propodeal suture, a subhorizontal dorsal face, then a sloping posterior face. In some cases the dorsal and posterior faces are in the same plane, such that the propodeal suture appears very shallow with no posterior wall, and the propodeum forms a single declivity from the propodeal suture to the petiolar insertion. The transition is like a wrinkle in a rug being gradually smoothed out.

The anteroventral petiolar tooth may be long, narrowly acute, and sharp. If long and sharp, it may project anteriorly, with the entire ventral margin of the petiole, including the tooth, in the same plane, or the ventral margin of the tooth may curve resulting in an upwardly concave ventral margin. Alternatively, the tooth may be reduced to a nearly right angle.

The fourth abdominal tergite may have an even vestiture of erect setae over the entire surface. In other cases the setae are clustered anterolaterally, often leaving a medial strip bare. The tergite may be completely bare, or with only 1-3 setae anterolaterally.

The above character variation is continuous rather than discrete, and all combinations of characters seem to occur. However, variation is not random, and clusters of correlated characters occur that suggest distinct sympatric species. Within Costa Rica, for which abundant material is available, I have come to the conclusion that there are three sympatric species: crinosa  HNS  , torosa  HNS  , and rochai  HNS  . However, occasional specimens exhibit combinations of characters that blur the distinctions. I have not discovered characters that are uniformly diagnostic. These three "character clusters" seem to occur widely in the Neotropics. For example, abundant collections from southeast Texas in the USA almost all match torosa  HNS  , but one collection exhibits all the characters of crinosa  HNS  , suggesting that two species are sympatric there. However, among the other collections I have been able to examine from scattered localities in the Neotropics, many show combinations of characters that do not match one of these three. As in other complex taxa, there is probably a combination of widespread lineages and narrow endemics. Additional collections and character analysis will be necessary to gain a clearer picture.

Given the ecological prevalence and the large character variation in the complex, many taxonomic names have been generated. In an attempt to bring some order to the nomenclature and to prepare the way for future taxonomic work, I summarize below the available names I associate with the crinosa  HNS  complex (or remove from the complex). No new synonymy is proposed, but many changes in status are made to eliminate trinomials and liberate names from the various assumed relationships to other species. Species are either discussed separately or grouped by salient characters.