Probolomyrmex , Taylor, R. W., 1965

Taylor, R. W., 1965, A monographic revision of the rare tropicopolitan ant genus Probolomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)., Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 117, pp. 345-365: 363-364

publication ID

2805

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/34422BD0-554A-63CF-8AC3-CAB8CF0242C7

treatment provided by

Christiana

scientific name

Probolomyrmex
status

comb. n.

VI. A Species Properly Excluded from Probolomyrmex  HNS  : (?) Leptanilla palauensis (M. R. Smith)  HNS  , comb. n.

Probolomyrmex palauensis M. R. Smith  HNS  , 1953, J. N. Y. ent. Soc. 61: 127 - 129, figs. 1 - 2. [[ male ]]. Type locality: S. W. of Ulimang, Babelthaup I., Palau Islands, Micronesia. Holotype: United States National Museum (examined).

This species was described from a single male collected without associated workers or queens. The general habitus is somewhat like that of the female castes of Probolomyrmex  HNS  , but knowledge of the male of P. greavesi  HNS  precludes the possibility that palauensis  HNS  belongs in that genus.

A completely satisfactory generic assignment for palauensisis not possible at present. Inclusion in the Formicidae is acceptable on the basis of the nodal form and other general characters, although metapleural glands are not visible on the specimen. The presence of these organs is apparently a universal and definitive character in female ants, but their presence among the males has never been objectively surveyed. A spot check in the Museum of Comparative Zoology collection shows that metapleural glands are lacking, or externally indiscernible, in the males of many genera. Placement in the subfamily Ponerinae  HNS  is not tenable, since all known ponerine ants, of all castes, have the tergum and sternum of the second post-petiolar (fourth true abdominal) segment fused laterally to form a strong tubular structure and this is not so in the holotype of palauensis  HNS  .

I have concluded that a queried assignment to the genus Leptanilla  HNS  (subfamily Leptanillinae  HNS  ) provides the best placement for palauensis  HNS  . A number of male-based species have been described in Leptanilla  HNS  or in the possibly synonymous genus Phaulomyrma  HNS  by Santschi (1907, 1908) and by G. C. & E. W. Wheeler (1930). However, none of the known leptanilline males were collected in definite association with workers, and until such specimens are available the status of the Wheeler and Santschi species must be questioned. The only presumed leptanilline male available here for comparison with palauensis  HNS  is the holotype of Phaulomyrma javana Wheeler  HNS  and Wheeler. The two specimens agree sufficiently well for relationship between them to be reasonably assumed: if Phaulomyrma  HNS  is truly a leptanilline ant, then palauensis  HNS  probably is also.

The holotype of palauensis  HNS  resembles the presumed Leptanilla-Phaulomyrma males in the following features:

(1) The structure of the head, mandibles, frontoclypeal region, antennae, eyes and ocelJi. The oral palpi are unfortunately not visible in palauensis  HNS  .

(2) The torn wing fragments appear to have had extremely reduced venation, as in the leptanillines.

(3) The presence of one apical spur on the middle tibia and two on the posterior one, a feature characteristic of several of the described " Leptanilla  HNS  " males.

(4) Fusion of the lateral mesosomal sclerites is more marked in palauensis  HNS  than in the leptanillines, but the form of this tagma and of the petiole and gaster, is similar.

(5) The apparent absence of metapleural glands, which are not visible in the slidemounted type of Phaulomyrma  HNS  , even under phase-contrast examination.

(6) Workers and queens of available Leptanilla  HNS  species do not have the sclerites of the fourth abdominal segment fused laterally. This is so in the Phaulomyrma  HNS  male, and apparently also in the described Leptanilla  HNS  males, as well as in the type of palauensis  HNS  .

(7) The peculiar structure of the terminalia, especially that of the much enlarged non-retractile genital capsule, with its greatly elongated aedeagus. Wheeler & Wheeler (1930: fig. 2 c) show a ventral view of the genital capsule of Phaulomyrma  HNS  . In the specimen illustrated the apices of the gonoforceps are folded inwards in an apparently unnatural position; if they were unfolded the genital apex would closely resemble that of palauensis  HNS  , as shown in Smith's figure 2. A similar folding of the gonoforceps evidently occurred in the specimens illustrated by Santschi, and with appropriate correction they too would resemble palauensis  HNS  .

According to the diagnoses of Wheeler & Wheeler (1930), palauensis  HNS  appears closer to Phaulomyrma  HNS  in some features than to Leptanilla  HNS  . However, placement of this species in Leptanilla  HNS  seems sensible in view of the uncertainty surrounding the status of all these forms.